Part of my process is showing the need for support of
scaffolds in the general education classroom. If I am given an English Language
Learner (ELL) student to evaluate for special education, it is difficult to
qualify that student based on the validity and reliability of the standardized
assessments for ELL students. The trouble with giving the student the
assessment in their native-tongue is that many students are considered poor-bilinguals
and struggle with that language as well. Part of this journey has shown me that
I need to know and understand the scaffolds for ELL students to support them in
the general education classroom.
This blog post is a review of the journal article "Five
Strategies to Help Beginning ELL’s Meet the Common Core" as published
by The California Reader, in 2013, Vol. 47, No. 1, pg. 27-31.
Our goal as educators is to support the academic achievement
of our students, and part of that is supporting them in meeting the standards.
My research is trying to understand how to detect if an ELL student requires
special education services. Since my academic placement is new to a huge growth
in ELL students, not all classroom teachers have an understanding of how to
support ELL students in class.
The article starts off explaining that ELL students need
support in developing a greater language proficieny to meet the listening and
speaking standards (pg 27). It is very common for beginning ELL students to be
quiet and shy. This makes knowing and figuring out their needs very challenging
for teachers. There are five strategies that support early ELL students to
understand their needs to reach academic achievement (pg 28).
One strategy to support ELL student’s comprehension in class
to is to analyze how you communicate with students. The article suggests that
having “caretaker” speech is necessary to insure ELL students are listening to
you communicating with them. The article describes “caretaker” speech as having
a calming, and soft voice. The article expands that talking quickly and loudly
can appear to be aggressive to ELL students, making their environment unpleasant.
The article continues with suggesting teacher to talk in simple sentences. This
helps to ensure that students have the chance to understand what is being
communicated (pg 28).
A second strategy the article supports using in the general
education classroom for ELL students is the practice of using real objects and
visuals. The article describes that when ELL’s see written words it can be incomprehensible.
The article makes a good comparison to trying to read Chinese symbols and
trying to interpret the meaning without any knowledge of Chinese. The article
expresses the importance of not assuming students understand the meaning of
words, and to take the time to present them prior to the lesson. The article
expresses that using concreate objects to support comprehension has students
tap into their senses, which supports their memory for learned material.
Lastly, the article expresses that even a simple drawing can make the
difference of a comprehensible lesson for ELL students (pg 29).
Another strategy is to introduce the Total Physical Response
(TPR). The article depicts the importance of meaning to support learning. One
strategy the article discusses is how adding movement can help with
comprehension. Movement should be explicit and intentional to convey clearly
what is being learned (pg 29). I have added movement into my lesson on how to create
a simple sentence. We make a big gesture
to emphasize using a capital letter at the beginning, jump every time we need a
space and put a fist in the air for ending with a period. Overall, students
know the movements more than the words capital and period, but they attach the
movement to the meaning.
The next strategy that the article asks teachers to utilize is
the support of the students first language. The article explains that students
can access deeper thoughts when they have the opportunity to express themselves
more comfortably. If you have two ELL students who share the same first
language, allow them to pair up and talk in their first language. The article
expresses how much their growth can be stunted if they are asked to speak only
English in class (pg 29).
Lastly, the article asks teachers to utilize engaging books
to read to students. Reading to students helps them learn words and how to
pronounce them correctly. The article continues to express that support their
auditory learning is just as important as their visual learning (pg 30). Reflecting
on this article makes me think that auditory learning is not always the main
priority, when teaching students to read is so important. However, that
auditory learning is best practice for all students and appears to be very
important for ELL students.
Overall, part of supporting ELL students in the general
education classroom is making sure they understand meaning. It is so easy to
assume that a student understands what you are saying. In my experience, ELL
students are able to observe what is going around them to support their own
actions. Although this is a great strategy to support their ability to stay on
task, it leads teachers to believe they understand what is being communicated
to them. I believe the strategies shared in this article also reflect best
practice for supporting all students, especially special education students. I
would like to share these simple strategies with teachers to support all of
their students. I will support general education teachers in implementing these
strategies in order to understand the level of support their ELL students need.
If the implementation of these strategies support the students’ academic growth,
it would appear that they can be successful in the general education classroom.
Jessica,
ReplyDeleteI really can see how your research is starting to take shape. Your articles are transitioning from issues to solutions, which are really helpful to read as a teacher! I like that you are sharing the research done to provide teachers with tools and tips when teaching ELL students. I also really like how your shared your personal experiences with adding movement into a language arts lesson. This blog post leaves me wanting more examples from you!
Have you come across any research that tackles the question of class size in regards to ELL? It sounds like it is a good idea for students to be able to build neurological connections with someone who is going through the same process. I am just wondering what you have experienced as an effective ratio within a Tier 1 level class, or is that irrelevant?
In your experience, what are the main concerns/feedback of a general education teacher who is new at implementing these strategies?